|
My Services
| It occurs to me that questions
might arise as to the need for engaging an expert. I have therefore set forth those
services which I provide which enhance your client's potential for recovery.
Actually the term "expert" is simplistic and not sufficiently inclusive.
The more appropriate term is Litigation Consultant and Expert. |
I......
 | Evaluate:
 | the merits of the action.
This evaluation is performed gratis, prior to accepting participation in the case.
A verbal discussion of the merits of the case is then provided. In the event
the case is one which I cannot support, it's better you find out at this juncture; |
 | the merits of the opposition's
position; |
 | relevant case law. |
|
 | Investigate:
 | the site to discover:
 | the cause(s) of the accident;
|
 | code violations relevant to the
accident; |
 | extant conditions which might
have contributed to the accident; |
|
 | articles, if any addressing
similar problems; |
 | relevant case law. |
|
 | Educate:
 | your partners and associates:
 | in the scientific and technical
issues; |
 | about issues concerning industry
practices; |
 | about industry terminology; |
 | company losses. |
|
 | the jury;
 | in the technical aspects of the
case; |
 | sufficiently to accept my
explanation of the technical facts; |
 | in the validity of your position |
|
|
 | Analyze:
 | the opposition's position for
flaws; |
 | depositions and interrogatories; |
 | discovery items; |
|
 | Project:
 | and provide refutation of, the
opposition's arguments; |
|
 | Locate:
 | other experts which might
contribute to your client's position; |
 | other responsible parties not
currently named in your client's action. |
|
 | Write:
 | an authoritative opinion of the
causation of, and parties responsible for, the accident; |
 | questions for the deposition of
the opposition's expert and for parties having knowledge of the accident or site. |
|
 | Testify:
 | at depositions; |
 | at ADR hearings; |
 | at trial. |
|
 | Create:
 | exhibits which portray various
technical aspects of the case for the edification of the jury; |
 | strategies to refute the opposition's arguments. |
|
Given all of these services, which a good consultant places
at the attorney's beck and call, it's understandable that Robert C. Strodel made the
following statement in Trial magazine: "For an
attorney to go into court without an expert waiting in the wings is legal
malpractice."
[ Home ] [ Up ] [ In Contempt ] [ Elevator Data ] [ Escalator Data ] [ Expert Services ]
01/27/00
|